I
have always learned best when I have an instructor who is excited about
what he or she is teaching. Seeing someone who is interested and
invested in the information I am learning benefits me, because I can often be
pretty skeptical on the front end. A good sense of humor in the presentation of material
is always nice.
I
am often reluctant to step outside my comfort zone, but I recognize
that I retain knowledge better when I am asked (or required) to go a
little beyond what I am comfortable with. This is one of the things I
am enjoying about this course: I would have never started a blog, got on
twitter, or explored RSS feeds on my own, but having to do it for a
class has given me the opportunity to see the value in these activities
and expand my own learning.
I
completed the Learning Style Inventory on the PSU website, and it
returned that I am a visual-tactile learner. Makes sense to me: I get
more from charts and graphs than from straight text; I retain better
from hands-on experiences; my most memorable and lasting educational
experiences are ones where I was involved in some activity.
It
is true that we can’t teach to every distinct learning style, so my
approach has always been openness and diversity. I try to keep my
outlook flexible and stay open to trying new things to reach my
students. For me, the best way to do this has been to constantly seek
input and feedback from my students. When they do a math problem, I ask
what their though process was; this is especially helpful in error
correction, and it allows me to tailor my instruction to individual
needs. I advocate using as many different avenues as possible when my
students are trying to learn new things: write it down, read it out
loud, talk to someone else about it, listen to someone else describe how
they do it, draw a diagram, etc. My hope is that this will touch on
the strengths of all students, while also allowing them to explore a
variety of learning styles. I think it is helpful to recognize your
strengths, but important to constantly work on your weaknesses.
Two years ago, I spent two days with an outstanding teacher from California as he shared with us his strategies for using learning styles, multiple intelligences and student interests to reach all learners. He even threw Bloom's taxonomy into the mix. It was the best conference I had been to in years and would love to attend one of his presentations again. I agree with you, when working with students, it is best to pepper the class with activities that cover all of the intelligences and learning styles, in some way, shape or form. That way, everyone feels included, and comfortable while learning.=8-)
ReplyDelete